What are your plans regarding the new IDS Compression feature:

This table lists all the recorded votes for this poll. If anonymous users are allowed to vote, they will be identified by the IP address of the computer they used when they voted.
Visitorsort iconVote
193.31.8.39We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
212.92.194.105We see no real benefit in compression
79.233.147.17We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
84.175.212.83We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
194.152.205.71We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
61.95.89.51We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
79.233.192.190We plan to purchase and use it
156.42.237.180We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
212.163.10.2We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
79.233.142.205We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
84.148.92.69We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
194.127.8.19We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
58.168.135.210We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
79.233.173.150We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
155.56.68.216We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
203.202.182.243We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
79.233.137.240We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
79.233.47.138We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
194.127.8.18We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee
218.111.20.71We would use it, if IBM wouldn't charge an extra license fee